JLL Reports New High in U.S. Office Vacancy Rate: 18.9%

First there was COVID. Then came the uncertainty of when, or if, employees would return to the office. Now comes inflation and rising interest rates. No wonder the office market remains in limbo across the United States.

JLL recently released its second quarter office outlook and, in little surprise, it shows an office market that is still struggling to regain its momentum following the pandemic while facing an uncertain economy.

According to the report, office transactions remained largely flat in the second quarter. JLL reported that gross leasing activity totaled 47.2 million square feet in the quarter, an increase of just 0.1% from the first quarter of the year. The reason for the sluggish activity level? Tenants, both large and small, have put their expansion plans on hold as they wait to see the impact of inflation and rising interest rates.

The U.S. office sector is still lagging when compared to the months before the pandemic. JLL says that second quarter leasing activity in the U.S. office market is now at 75.5% of its pre-pandemic norms.

Despite economic uncertainty, nearly half of all completed office leases in the second quarter came in at 10 years or longer, keeping the average lease term at eight years. Short-term expansions remained below 20% of all office lease activity, JLL reported.

Net absorption remained negative in the U.S. office market in the second quarter, with 7.8 million square feet of net occupancy loss during the most recent three months. A majority of the quarter’s negative net absorption — 69.4% — came in the Class-B and Class-C sectors.

Combined with 11.8 million square feet of new office deliveries in the quarter, this negative net absorption led to a 30-basis point rise in vacancy to a new high of 18.9% across the United States. The office vacancy rate stood at 16.5% for buildings delivered since 2015 and 19% for older properties.

Even in the down market, developers are bringing new office space to the U.S. market. According to JLL, that 11.8 million square feet of new office space delivered between April and June brought year-to-date completions to 26.5 million square feet. That puts the U.S. office market on track to repeat 2021’s more than 50 million square feet of new office space.

Colliers Q2 2022 | Houston Office

Commercial Real Estate Research & Forecast Report

“The office market, more than any other sector, is still dealing with occupiers grappling with long-term adjustments brought on by work-from-home shifts in the workforce and short-term concerns over the direction of the economy. The result is that larger organizations have been quiet, and most of the leasing activity has been with smaller, private companies. The larger organizations, which can best move the occupancy needle, are on the sidelines for now. Construction issues have improved slightly since Q1, and we expect continued improvement in that area for the balance of the year.” Patrick Duffy, MCR President, Houston

Key TakeawaysHouston office market records negative net absorptionVacancy up marginally by 10 basis pointsLeasing activity remains steady over quarterClass A occupiers gravitate toward newer product
Houston Highlights
Houston’s office market posted negative net absorption in Q2 2022, recording -224,211 square feet. The overall average vacancy rate rose marginally by 10 basis points between quarters from 23.4% to at 23.5%. Office inventory remained unchanged, as no new inventory was added and there is 2.0 million SF of office space under construction. Average rental rates increased over the year. Houston’s Class A overall average full service rental rate rose from $35.10 per square foot in Q2 2021 to $36.29 per square foot in Q2 2022. Leasing activity remained steady over the quarter, recording 2.9 million square feet, which includes renewals.

Houston Highlights

Houston’s office market posted negative net absorption in Q2 2022, recording -224,211 square feet. The overall average vacancy rate rose marginally by 10 basis points between quarters from 23.4% to 23.5%. Office inventory remained unchanged, as no new inventory was added and there is 2.0 million SF of office space under construction. Average rental rates increased over the year. Houston’s Class A overall average full service rental rate rose from $35.10 per square foot in Q2 2021 to $36.29 per square foot in Q2 2022. Leasing activity remained steady over the quarter, recording 2.9 million square feet, which includes renewals.

Executive Summary
Commentary by Rob Johnson | Vice President
While overall office vacancy in Houston’s Class A buildings currently exceeds 25%, newer Class A buildings continue to show strong absorptions trends, leaving a wake of opportunity for prepared and informed office users.

Many real estate publication headlines will quickly lead readers to statistics outlining the vacancy rate of office buildings in Houston. According to statistics from our data sources, the current Class A office vacancy across all of Houston is 25.7%, however, this can be a misleading statistic.

Organizations that continue to show firm commitments for in-person office presence have indicated their desire for premium facilities. Justification can range from employee recruitment and retention to maintaining an image.

When looking at Class A occupancy of properties larger than 100,000 RSF delivered to the market in the last ten years, an alternate picture emerges. Across all Houston submarkets, this younger asset class has a vacancy rate of 13.9%, a statistically significant decrease from the 25.7% for all Class A buildings. This data set’s occupancy and absorption trends suggest a more competitive market for newer Class A product.

Additionally, several large Class A buildings have been delivered to Houston’s CBD in recent years. It is important to consider that these buildings will likely need some time to accurately determine their effect on the market and if they will further exacerbate the trend of movement from legacy Class A properties to newer product. When users maintain the same occupancy footprint when relocating, the absorption net result is marginal. Still, it is important to note what asset class the occupiers were vacating and which buildings they are gravitating toward.

Lease commitments at the newer Class A buildings have created an opportunity in some legacy Class A assets where owners compete for tenants to fill available space and maintain existing tenants. Many of the legacy Class A assets have undergone, or are in the process of, large capital projects to provide or improve the amenities tenants have come to expect from Class A buildings. In addition, many landlords are providing concession packages that enhance their attractiveness to existing occupants to maintain their tenancy as well as to attract new potential users considering a different location.

For tenants to capitalize on the opportunities in the current office market, two key factors will play a significant role: 1) knowledge of which landlords and assets are willing to provide rich concession packages, and 2) the creditworthiness of the occupier. With proper direction, strong credit tenants will likely find amenity-rich buildings with economic concession packages that will not likely be seen again until the next tenant-friendly market cycle – perhaps years from now.

Newmark Represents Sale of 33-Asset Industrial Portfolio in Midland, Texas’ Permian Basin

Irvine, CA (July 13, 2022) — Newmark announces the for-sale opportunity of the ERP industrial collection, a 33-asset net leased industrial portfolio located in the Permian Basin in Midland, Texas, one of the largest oil fields in the world.

Newmark’s Net Lease Capital Markets group comprising of Vice Chairman Matt Berres, Director Samer Khalil and Associate Karick Brown in partnership with Vice Chairman, Divisional Head of International Capital Markets Alex Foshay and International Capital Markets Analyst Victoria Radman are representing Energy Related Properties (“ERP”) as the exclusive sales agents for the collection in cooperation with Newmark Executive Managing Director Lispah Hogan, CCIM, MCR.

The portfolio comprises 33 single- and multi-tenant net leased assets totaling 662,714 square feet on 160.7 acres. Currently 91% leased, the portfolio offers a diversified and staggered rent roll and has maintained an average occupancy of more than 90% over the past five years, despite fluctuations in oil prices. Out-of-area investors have the option of retaining and benefiting from Midland-based Energy Related Properties’ highly experienced portfolio management and unique knowledge of the Permian Basin market.

The Permian Basin is the highest producing oil field in the world and one of the largest. The region stretches from Western Texas into Southeastern New Mexico. The strategically located tier 1 assets were selected for their best-in-class locations in immediate proximity to Midland’s major highways such as Interstate 20 and Texas State Highways 80, 158, 191 & FM 1788. The portfolio assets are also proximate to the Midland International Airport, providing ease of access to both tenants and ownership.

“This is an extremely rare opportunity to acquire a masterfully curated portfolio of the best assets in the Permian Basin and a significant market share position,” said Berres. “Global oil markets are exceptionally tight given current geopolitical tensions and possible disruption to supplies.

In line with the wider increased energy production of the Permian Basin, this portfolio stands to benefit significantly from these market dynamics.”

Foshay added, “Beyond the physical real estate precisely meeting the market’s needs and the locations of this collection of assets, the portfolio’s tenancy profile also offers immediate access to substantial growth and a highly efficient inflationary hedge, a combination which is increasingly difficult to find in today’s market. The mix of high-quality upstream tenants at rents 20% below market and the attractive staggered lease profile, against the backdrop of outperforming oil markets, make the portfolio one of the few commercial real estate offerings with genuine significant growth in the short to medium term.”

Press Contact: Alexa Nestlerode t 949-608-2170 alexa.nestlerode@nmrk.com

Market Dislocation May Uncover Silver Lining For Commercial Real Estate Lending

The global economy, commercial real estate included, has forced some lenders and investors to sit on the sidelines. Changing interest rates, inflation and recent shifts have resulted in investors losing deals and having to push the pause button. The volatility has slowed down activity and market rates have moved quickly.

Some experts believe interest rates for debt could rise 200 to 300 basis points, which would not favor borrowers. Not only will that make it challenging to underwrite deals, but many will no longer even pencil, especially those expecting to find a low cost of capital.

he global economy, commercial real estate included, has forced some lenders and investors to sit on the sidelines. Changing interest rates, inflation and recent shifts have resulted in investors losing deals and having to push the pause button. The volatility has slowed down activity and market rates have moved quickly.

Some experts believe interest rates for debt could rise 200 to 300 basis points, which would not favor borrowers. Not only will that make it challenging to underwrite deals, but many will no longer even pencil, especially those expecting to find a low cost of capital.

The historically low interest rates over the past 10 years have created an environment where the norm was cheap money. That is swiftly changing, and borrowers must adjust. Debt is getting more expensive, though I have seen that equity is cheaper in many instances as investors accept lower yields. Overall, the reality is lenders are not underwriting like they used to.

We are seeing a flight to fixed rates as borrowers attempt to reduce their exposure to rising rates and skyrocketing interest rate caps costs. In times when interest rates were flat or lower, the cost of interest rate caps was cheap. But costs have soared in the past year. Additionally, some shorter-term investors are shifting strategies (paywall) to a longer-term hold since they cannot find strong deals to replace existing assets.

The rise of interest rates is putting downward pressure on loan dollars and overall loan-to-value ratio which has reduced lending activity. Some seller servicers and DUS lenders are pushing the agencies to reduce their debt service coverage requirements to mitigate the loss of loan dollars, but it is not likely that Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac will change any requirements. There is some room in the spreads to be reduced since they have been lower in past.

Forecasting

There are changes and adjustments underway in the marketplace. For now, it doesn’t look like any agency relief is forthcoming, and that is expected to continue holding back deal flow. In the second half of 2022, I predict that activity could accelerate as the agencies look at their allocations and realize they need to push more capital into the marketplace to meet their annual goals. But the reduction of spreads remains uncertain and bridge loan spreads are increasing.

Real market dislocation may be ahead and that could result in a 10% or 15% drop in asking prices. Opportunities may surface for deals that are falling out now to get sucked up by those waiting in wings. We may see institutional capital move into the middle market space and pursue smaller deals or explore secondary markets that they might not have looked into before.

Higher rates might allow these institutions to absorb lower leverage since they are flush with cash. The market was previously driven by 1031 exchange opportunities, but investors will need more to put down and pay more to win deals. We continue to see those buyers active because many are selling or have sold, so they need to move into a new investment before the tax advantages they gained evaporate. It will be interesting to see how investors like institutional groups handle lower leverage.

On the lending side, especially in the bridge debt space, debt yield requirements are being raised and that will affect loan amounts in the lower levels. Investors may not buy assets at a low cap rate, electing to chase yield in other sectors such as limited-service hotels.

Market disruption brings opportunities for those who are savvy and patient. First, some of the competition will be reduced. I believe the market has been too frothy, so taking a breather may be the pause needed to return to sound fundamentals.

Second, a slowdown will allow those on the sidelines or new entrants previously boxed out to come in. The market ahead may be one in which lower returns become popular. Lenders may focus on de-risking strategies and pull back from certain markets where they have more portfolio exposure, helping to ensure diversification. Smart money could decrease leverage 5% from the current loan-to-cost ratio (paywall), currently in the 70% to 75% range, and could help reduce the leverage offered in the bridge lending space.

Completing construction deals is a bit more troubling today because rent increases are not keeping pace with construction costs. That’s causing projects to enter a zone where they no longer are viable. Traditionally, construction lenders have focused on the projected yield on cost (the projected net operating income divided by the total project cost) to determine viability. For multifamily, this figure sits around 6% (the lowest it has likely ever been).

Lenders want to see a spread between the yield on cost and the property’s market cap rate to ensure profitability. For example, if a multifamily property sells at a 4.5% cap rate and the yield on cost to build to finished product is also 4.5%, there’s no profit incentive to move forward.

We are seeing deals with low yield on cost emerge due to construction cost increases. The developer then must find other ways to make a project pencil, though trying to do so via higher rents could be problematic. Construction budgets from just a few months ago are, in many cases, significantly higher.

Still, many lenders and investors are sitting on large amounts of cash as we enter this uncertain market. Sellers who have divested assets, or investors who have de-risked portfolios, are now in a position to weather what may come and could capitalize on opportunities that arise. Even if they elected to stay put, I predict they will be just fine since they hold real assets that provide hedges against inflation and have proven to be a sound place to invest in and place money in.

There have been moments when we’ve needed to tread with more caution. This is probably one of those times.

The Promise of Onshoring: As Companies Bring Manufacturing Back to the U.S., Demand for Industrial Space Soars Even Higher

The industrial market across the country is enjoying plenty of momentum, with companies’ demand for new industrial space seemingly unquenchable. But a push by companies to open more manufacturing facilities in the United States is only adding fuel to the hot industrial market.

During the earliest days of the COVID-19 pandemic, consumers were shocked to find plenty of empty shelves at their local grocers and retailers. At the same time, those ordering exercise equipment, electronics and clothing from Amazon and other online retailers noticed that these products were taking longer to show up at their doors.

Companies don’t want this to happen again. Because of that, many are bringing their manufacturing operations back to the United States.

What does this mean? Only that the onshoring of manufacturing back to the United States is providing yet another boost to the already sizzing industrial market.

Chris McKee, principal and chief development officer for St. Louis-based real estate development and investment firm CRG, said that the demand for manufacturing space in the United States has consistently been on the rise since the start of the pandemic. And it’s not just onshoring that is behind this. He said many companies are also modernizing their manufacturing base and are seeking newer, more modern facilities.

McKee said that this trend isn’t about to slow.

“There are more users in the market who are manufacturers than at any point in my 20-year career,” he said. “The manufacturing sector is one of the strongest sectors in the industrial market. It’s been picking up steam for the last 12 months and has some legs.”

Robert Smietana, vice chairman and chief executive officer of Chicago-based HSA Commercial Real Estate, said that his company is still mainly developing industrial warehouse space. But he, too, has seen an uptick in the number of companies looking for manufacturing space, too.

A good example? HSA has been working with HARIBO, the company that makes all those multi-colored gummi bear candies, on its first North American manufacturing plant that will open in Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin.

“The idea just made sense,” Smietana said. “HARIBO’s customer base in North America is very large. They were shipping and manufacturing their gummi bears from 10 countries around the world to North America. it was time for them to open a facility here to help meet the demand.”

This facility will rank as the largest capital investment in HARIBO’s history.

“With this substantial investment, we’re strategically setting our business up for long term growth in the U.S., and we are looking forward to a bright future,” said Hans Guido Riegel, managing partner of the HARIBO Group, in a statement.

COVID-fueled

McKee pointed to two reasons for this increase in demand. First, companies are working hard to keep their products on store shelves. To help avoid some of the product shortages that the country saw during the early days of COVID, companies are committing to manufacture more of their products in the United States instead of overseas.

At the same time, companies want their manufacturing facilities to be closer to their customers. They also want more control over the quality of their products. Locating manufacturing facilities in the United States instead of in overseas locations helps companies meet both goals.

“What happened in China, with heavy-duty COVID lockdowns, took companies in the United States by surprise,” McKee said. “That is a big driver for this move. I also think part of it is the modernization of manufacturing. Companies that want to modernize their manufacturing processes are looking for space in the United States.”

“I hope this is a trend,” Smietana said. “It seems that having your manufacturing space near your distribution space near your customer has become more important. If you look at 20 years ago, companies were moving toward just-in-time deliveries and moving their manufacturing across the ocean. We’ve all found out during the past several years that this model is flawed.”

It’s also more cost-efficient for companies to manufacture products near their customer base, Smietana said. Even with labor being cheaper in many overseas locations, increased shipping and distribution costs make manufacturing overseas a more expensive proposition today. And as fuel prices remain high, these costs will only continue to rise.

“A lot of companies were looking at onshoring before COVID,” Smietana said. “The pandemic just reinforced their concerns. Right now, every manufacturer and distributor of goods is taking a hard look at their options, and many are considering moving their operations back to the United States.”

Supply issues

McKee said that this demand for new manufacturing space in the United States has been yet another boon to the industrial sector. Onshoring creates more demand, something that drives industrial development throughout the country.

Of course, more demand puts even more pressure on the construction and development industries. It’s still a challenge for builders and developers to get the construction supplies they need, with several key components still taking months to show up to job sites. Onshoring will only exacerbate these challenges.

CRG has faced this challenge, too, of course. But McKee said that the company’s integrated model – CRG acting as developer on projects, its construction firm Clayco building them and its in-house architecture firm handling the planning – has helped it keep projects on schedule, even when faced with supply and labor shortages.

“We are not negative when it comes to the shortages. It is what it is,” McKee said. “We are all facing this issue, and we are better suited than most to handle it. It is not something I stress and worry about every day. We focus on what we have to do each day to solve our customers’ problems.”

McKee said that while the shortages continue, there is more stability in the construction process today than there was last year and earlier this year. The shortages already rippled through several material types. Steel was the first material that became difficult to get. Then the industry saw shortages in insulation, roofing materials, roofing fasteners, electrical switch gear and concrete.

By relying on the integrated model of construction and development, though, CRG has been able to more efficiently navigate these shortages, McKee said.

“The issues in the supply chain have been significant for all of us,” he said. “And we don’t see these issues ending anytime soon. We have been fortunate, though, in that rents have continued to rise to support the increased costs of construction. If we get to the point where that stops, then we’ll see a significant downward pressure on construction starts.”

No end to the demand?

McKee said that the demand for industrial is highest in markets in which there are high barriers to entry, large populations or growing populations.

Demand remains high in the Northeast portion of the country, McKee says, because that slice of the United States has such a large population to serve. The Northeast also has high barriers to entry and long entitlement processes, with projects sometimes taking a year to complete. That makes this market extremely hot, McKee said.

The Southeast and Southwest regions of the country are experiencing strong population growth. Part of this is because people had more choices of where they could live during COVID. Many no longer had to live close to where they worked. This led to many people choosing the warmer temperatures of the southern part of the country. This booming population has led to a surge in demand for industrial space, whether manufacturing or distribution.

The Midwest is not a boom market, but it is still a strong region for industrial demand, McKee said. Industrial users like the Midwest because it’s easier to find skilled labor here. The Midwest is also a steadier market, not experiencing the same boom-and-bust cycles that many of the country’s hotter markets do.

“Most of the growth in demand in the Midwest is driven by a need for manufacturers and end users to be closer to their population centers,” McKee said. “There’s also a cheaper cost of living here. It’s easier to live in the Midwest than it is to live on the coasts. The Midwest has a lot going for it. It might not be booming like what we’re seeing in the Southeast and Southwest, but it still is doing tremendously well when it comes to industrial activity.”

As Smietana says, the hottest industrial markets will never be located in the Midwest. This doesn’t mean, though, that this region isn’t attractive to industrial end users.

He says that today, there is plenty of demand for industrial space in markets such as Columbus and Nashville. Smietana said that Chicago is always a strong industrial market and that Minneapolis, too, is seeing rising demand for industrial space.

“The Midwest has always been a steady-Eddie market,” Smietana said. “The highs in the Midwest are never as high as the highs in the coasts, but the lows are never as low.”

But what about rising interest rates? Is that one development that could slow demand for industrial space?

Smietana said that this is a possibility. But many companies realize that they have a need to open manufacturing facilities in the United States, even if interest rates here are higher today.

“I don’t think companies with these major plans are going to be wavered or hindered by these current economic headwinds,” Smietana said.

The strong demand for industrial assets means that it can be difficult for companies to find space in many markets. That’s led to a rise in spec industrial construction.

As McKee says, when users need the space, they need the space. It’s why so many are willing to move into industrial space that has already been built rather than wait through the build-to-suit process.

“There is no vacancy in many markets,” McKee said. “Users look and look and look and they struggle to find anything. Users must be very aggressive and make decisions about space quickly. They must take the space when it is available.”

How Many Deals Will Rising Interest Rates Wipe Away?

When the Federal Reserve last month raised interest rates by three-quarters of a percentage point, it ranked as the agency’s most aggressive such hike since 1994.

The Fed made this move to combat inflation. But commercial real estate pros worry that rising interest rates could scuttle deals that were set to close but might no longer make sense now that rates are high.

How has this impacted commercial real estate deals so far? It’s still early, but CRE pros say they are keeping a close watch on deals in progress. Many are still closing, they say, but others will certainly crumble.

The consensus, though, is that interest rates have the possibility to slow the momentum that commercial real estate enjoys today, if the Fed is overly aggressive in boosting interest rates.

“I agree that a 50-basis-points to 75-basis-points increase is appropriate, but the Fed needs to be careful not to overcorrect,” sadi Joshua Simon, chief executive officer of SimonCRE, in a statement. “Inflation is going to be a lagging indicator that needs to be watched. They will need to raise rates, but at some point, they need to wait to see the results before enacting more increases. There has been major fallout already within transactions and further investments will be delayed.”

In his statement, Simon said that Fed reacted late in its efforts to combat inflation. This means that it must now enact larger rate hikes to make up for their earlier inaction.

“This means we should see a slowdown in activity to some extent, primarily in floating-rate deals,” Simon said. “Construction will have to slow down.”

A shock to the system

Hal Collett, chief operating officer with the Minneapolis office of Colliers Mortgage, said that it was unrealistic to expect interest rates to remain as low as they had been. Such low rates were unprecedented.

But that doesn’t mean that such a sudden rate hike by the Fed doesn’t hurt, he said.

“It is a bit of a shock to the system,” Collett said. “We all anticipated that we wouldn’t be at all-time low interest rates for the rest of our lives. But it is shocking how quickly they moved.”

As Collett says, Colliers Mortgage uses the 10-year Treasury to price many of its deals. That rate more than doubled after the Fed’s move.

“That was a bit of a shock,” Collett said. “The cost of capital went up. Refinance activity that might have been in place suddenly went away.”

Dan Trebil, managing director and senior vice president with the Minneapolis office of Northmarq, said that commercial real estate boasts some advantages that should help keep the deals and financing requests flowing, even with higher interest rates.

As Trebil says, investors still need to put their money somewhere, and commercial real estate remains a favored investment type.

“The good news is, there is still a lot of money out there,” Trebil said. “Real estate fundamentals are still good. People’s properties are still operating well. A quick run-up in interest rates like this has put the brakes on some refinances that might have made sense before but don’t make sense now. But there is still demand for commercial real estate.”

Trebil, though, is realistic. He says that the rising rates have caused some investors who were ready to acquire new properties to pause their plans. These investors are waiting to see the full impact higher interest rates might have on commercial real estate.

“There is a price discovery going on now between buyers and sellers, and lenders, too, on where to price debt now that rates have risen,” Trebil said.

Collett describes the commercial finance market as a bit more tempered today than it was before the Fed made its big move.

“People have had to recalibrate,” he said. “It has slowed down a little. It’s not as frothy as it was. But there is still a lot of business getting done out there.”

Collett said that how investors view today’s higher interest rates might depend on how they long they have been sinking their dollars in commercial real estate. As he says, the last 10 to 15 years of lower interest rates has been the anomaly. Today’s higher rates? They are closer to the historic norm.

Again, though, it’s been the suddenness of the jump in interest rates that has spooked many investors.

“Interest rates of 2% or 2.5% on big commercial deals is not normal,” Collett said. “People are just surprised when it goes from 2.5% to 4.5% within 90 days. You would’ve loved to have seen the Fed get ahead of inflation and raise rates naturally. That way, there would have been no shock to the system. But that didn’t occur. The shock of the sudden increase sent people spiraling for a minute.”

Financing requests still coming in

With that being said, Northmarq remains busy, and commercial financing requests continue to roll in, Trebil said. And Trebil said that he expects this to continue.

“It goes back to the fact that people still view real estate as an attractive asset class,” Trebil said. “A lot of money is still available out there.”

At the same time, commercial real estate remains a safe place for investor dollars. This is especially true with the multifamily and industrial sectors. But Trebil said that more financing requests are coming in for hospitality assets today, too. He’s even seen an increase in requests for retail properties.

The office sector? That one still faces plenty of uncertainty, Trebil said. And because of that uncertainty, there aren’t as many financing requests today for office investments or new developments.

“A lot of the questions about office are still there,” Trebil said. “But a lot of properties are working through that as tenants’ leases expire. They are resizing. Their space needs might or might not have changed. As companies work through that, there will be less unknowns about this sector. The big question is what those tenants who signed office leases before COVID will do now that their leases are coming up for renewal. Will they take 50% less space? Will they stick with what they have?”

Even with office’s challenges, Trebil sees plenty of positives in the commercial financing business. He said that the progress he’s seen in the hospitality industry is especially impressive.

“We weren’t talking about hotels at all a year ago, except as problems,” Trebil said. “The hospitality market is doing surprisingly well today. We are also seeing more financing requests for manufactured housing and self-storage. We are seeing a much broader spectrum in terms of the property types we are working with.”

Still, multifamily and industrial continue to account for the majority of financing requests today, Trebil said. And that doesn’t look to change any time soon.

Trebil said that multifamily remains especially strong, even in markets such as Minneapolis in which monthly rents haven’t been soaring quite as much.

“The rental market has been really strong,” Trebil said. “Minneapolis doesn’t have the same kind of apartment rent growth as you see in a lot of other markets across the country. A lot of markets, especially down south, are seeing huge rent increases on a year-over-year basis. We don’t see those big numbers, but we are still an attractive market. We are a stable, steady multifamily market.”

Collett agrees that multifamily and industrial remain the biggest draw for financing dollars. He said, too, that healthcare and seniors housing are also generating a greater number of financing requests today.

In little surprise, Collett agreed that financing requests for the office sector were coming in at a far slower pace.

While many big companies are demanding that employees come back to the office, there is still no consensus on whether workers will comply. Collett said that this approach will work for some major companies, but others might lose employees who find jobs that offer more flexible working conditions.

“Flexible schedules are here to stay,” Collett said. “That will impact the demand for office space. Multifamily, industrial, seniors housing and healthcare remain the best investments. They have been the best investments for the last five years.”

The hot housing market has boosted demand for multifamily assets, Collett said. Single-family home prices continue to rise. Renting for an extended period, then, makes financial sense for many. And because of this, developers are building more apartment developments and investors are gobbling up these assets as monthly rents rise.

“Back in the day, people would get married, get a house, have 2.5 kids and get a dog,” Collett said. “That’s no longer the case. People wait longer to get married. They want to live near places with lots of amenities. They want a short commute to work. It’s all led to more demand for multifamily. From an investment perspective, multifamily is a very attractive option. It holds up very effectively.”

Industrial is thriving today, too, and the requests for financing to fund projects and acquisitions in this sector continue at a steady pace. Collett said that he expects this sector to remain hot throughout the rest of this year and into 2023.

“Industrial is a resilient asset that comes at a reasonable cost,” he said. “You don’t have a lot of overhead like you do with office assets. Industrial is an efficient investment. There are plenty of opportunities for investors in the industrial side.”

When considering financing requests, and whether to approve them, Northmarq looks at several factors, Trebil said. Some of this has changed now that interest rates have risen. As Trebil says, depending on the financing source, it’s no longer possible to always get to 75% or 85% leverage on deals.

“We are recognizing that we might not be able to get to the same dollar amounts because of where interest rates are,” Trebil said. “One of the factors we have to consider, then, is if the dollar amount being requested is realistic.”

Otherwise, Northmarq still considers the same basic factors when evaluating financing requests: How strong is the sponsor and is the project being acquired or developed in a quality location?